•
Part
01h
Feature
Story
- Ask Priscilla! • Why -
They Said It:
TVInews attempts
to uncover the true intent of an "extra ordinary
story" by an author, and the publishers' reasoning
as to why they printed the story line. TheySaidIt
is a major journalistic course in the study of Dr.
Lawrence Farwell 's "Brain Fingerprinting"
technology. You'll find that one mans
disappointment, is another man's achievement.MORE
Yes90 They Said
It-113
Gerry
Vassilatos explains his theories and how the
electromagnetic fields of energy propagate up thru
the earth and create radio waves. This is how
Ground Radio works in transmitting the human voice
as Nathan Stublefield did. •
AN
INTRODUCTION TO THE MYSTERIES OF GROUND
RADIO by Gerry Vassilatos
http://www.borderlands.com/newstuff/research/ground-myst.htm
http://www.icehouse.net/john34/groundradio.html
GROUND Radio is a subject which has remained on
the periphery of engineering discussions for
decades. It has maintained its elusive and
mysterious poise because of fundamental anomalies
observed when its methods are utilized, anomalies
which manifest when signals are both transmitted
and received directly through the ground. The
inability to adequately address the associated
anomalies has produced a remarkable impasse among
conventional engineers. Many highly qualified such
persons are quite sure that the Ground Radio
phenomenon is adequately explained through classic
theoretical propagation models. Experimental
findings however, have brought to our attention
several anomalous features of this form of Radio
propagation
•••Later
critics attempted the reduction of the Stubblefield
Radio System to mere "subsoil conduction" mode of
transmission, but remain completely unable to
reproduce the performance to this day. Mr.
Stubblefield repeatedly stated confidence in the
fact that his Radio System was performing an act of
modulation, not a transmission of signal power. The
preexisting "electrical waves in the earth", he
firmly stated, were the real energy carriers for
his Wireless Telephone Exchange. The special "earth
cells" were connective terminals, not power
antennas; a means by which direct connection with
the geomantic energy stratum was obtained.
•••Hoping
to save the finance of excessive wire line, many
telegraph systems implemented the discovery that
code could easily "pass through water". To this
end, engineers experimented with the use of widely
separated groundplates, a means which proved
strangely successful. Experiments with
ground-conduction established telegraphic contact
through an isthmus (Morse, 1842), through streams
(Vail, 1843), wide rivers (Lindsay, 1843), canals
(Highton, 1852), across a bay (Meucci, 1846),
through the earth (Stubblefield, 1872), and between
distant islands (Preece, 1880). An accidental
discovery proved that one longline system continued
operating with great strength of signal, despite
the fact that the line had been literally broken in
several places. The realization that code signals
could actually enter and traverse the ground for
several hundred yards, and then reenter a grounded
line, triggered a new revolution.
•••Here
were the early beginnings of the conduction
wireless methods, and relied on the mysterious
nature of ground conduction and ground energy for
their successful operation.
•••It
was clear to linesmen and operators that the signal
energy could not possibly be maintained over such
long ground and water conduction paths without
amplification.
•••Other
researchers corroborated the fact that usable
amounts of current could actually be derived from
the ground, currents whose powerful displays
permitted the elimination of battery cups and
generators. The failure of all reductive electrical
models to satisfactorily address these energetic
characteristics became especially evident with the
development of the "earth batteries", an outgrowth
of these telegraphic observations (Bain, 1849).
These simple material composites, made to be buried
in earth, produced currents not explained through
electrolytic action. Small buried earth batteries
developed sufficient power to charge storage
batteries. They were also employed to provide
telegraphic (Bryan, Cerpaux, Dieckmann, Jacques,
Bear), and later telephonic systems (Stubblefield,
Strong, Brown, Tomkins, Lockwood) with
uninterrupted operating power. Neither decomposing
nor failing with months of buried use, the
mysterious earth batteries contain an essential
mystery which electrodynamic models cannot
adequately explain.
•••Those
who doubt these facts may attempt the simplest of
experiments. Place two identical copper rods into
the ground however distant your skepticism demands.
The ground can be dry. Connect a galvanometer to
each rod by means of thin wire. An anomalous
positive reading results. This simple fact
illustrates the concepts taught by Nathan
Stubblefield, who stated that earth batteries do
not generate electricity: they intercept and
receive ground flowing telluric currents. If you
wish to find strong telluric currents by this
means, place one of your two ground rods into a
tree root. The galvanometer should be wired close
to this base. The other rod is wired and can be
placed in sequentially different spots. Readings
can literally "pin" the meter, holding it there for
weeks. •
GROUNDWAVE RADIO
The late part of the Nineteenth Century was a rich
and productive time for the empirical researchers,
those who explored the deep mysteries of ground
conduction radio. Such investigation produced a new
world of possibilities in the Wireless Arts.
Experimenters found distinctive differences when
varieties of geometric shapes were simply buried, a
series of discoveries having no satisfactory
conventional explanation. A great many highly
specialized ground "antennas" were developed and
patented during this time period, a technology
which provoked both disbelief and criticism on
numerous counts.
•••The
very first vocal radio broadcast was engaged by
Nathan B. Stubblefield (1872). Mr. Stubblefield
employed special "earth cells" and long iron rods
to transmit strong vocal signals "with great
clarity". These signals traversed a mile or more of
ground, a coordinated conduction wireless system
providing telephone service for a hardworking farm
community. The Stubblefield Radio Method represents
an essential technological mystery. His "earth
cells" never wore out, never produced heat in their
telephonic components, and provided "signal ready"
power at any given instant of the day. Being
neither activated or assisted by additional battery
power, the system was fully operational around the
clock.
•••Later
critics attempted the reduction of the Stubblefield
Radio System to mere "subsoil conduction" mode of
transmission, but remain completely unable to
reproduce the performance to this day. Mr.
Stubblefield repeatedly stated confidence in the
fact that his Radio System was performing an act of
modulation, not a transmission of signal power. The
preexisting "electrical waves in the earth", he
firmly stated, were the real energy carriers for
his Wireless Telephone Exchange. The special "earth
cells" were connective terminals, not power
antennas; a means by which direct connection with
the geomantic energy stratum was obtained.
•••In
an entirely different regime of exploration, a
regime having nothing whatsoever to do with
waveradio energies, Dr. Nikola Tesla directed the
construction of a massive radiating structure on
the northshore of Long Island. His previous years
of experience taught him the secrets concerning
radiant energy and its effective propagation
through the air and space (1892 to 1900).
Understanding the means by which radiant energy may
be more effectively beamed down through the ground,
Dr. Tesla established the magnificent Wardenclyffe
Station (1901). Tesla intended Wardenclyffe to be
the first of a series, stations for the
subterranean beam transmission of radiant
energy.Propagation of very large diameter radiant
energy beams had been found more effective for
given power purposes, when conducted through solid
rock. Tesla found that the earth was transparent to
these penetrating straightline beams, and planned
the use of deeply imbedded ground terminals in
order to direct and launch his special radiant
energy.
•••Of
the many energetic interactions occurring in and
among spark discharges, Hertz chose but two for
analysis (1887). Convention has agreeably
restricted its considerations to the same,
affirming that only two fields of influence make
themselves manifest at close distances from a
spark. The induction field, and the "radiowave
field". Induction field effects rapidly fall away
with the inverse square of distance from a spark
center. The "true radio energy" is that wave energy
which loses intensity with the inverse distance
from a spark center. This difference of intensity
with distance from the spark center defines the
radiofield. Radio texts described the "nearzone"
(induction field) and the "farzone" (radiofield).
Patent examiners used this model to eliminate all
but the Marconi claims for wireless transmission of
signals, a tragic reduction. Far more important
demonstrations proved the superiority of geomantic
radio principles. Certain highly qualified
experimenters disagreed with the simplistic
Hertzian view, and contradicted the views of a
growing mainstream (Stubblefield, Tesla, Massey,
Moray).
•••Experimenters
found that the "skywave-groundwave" model did not
explain the continued magnification of signals
"received through the ground". When compared to
signals "received through the air", the ground
signals were persistently more powerful, and far
less eroded by static.
•
GROUND TERMINALS Attempts of devising newer and more effective
ground antenna designs provoked several intriguing
explorations. The most amazing discoveries included
those made with relatively small buried metal
forms. Radio rules changed completely when buried
antenna were employed, the complete elimination of
Hertzian dimension restrictions being the first
observation. Unlike their aerial counterparts,
buried terminals were not bound by those exacting
requirements of wavelength. One did not require
lateral dimensions equal to the normal shortwave
aerial yardage, the first feature recognized by
radio amateurs.
•••Of
the many energetic interactions occurring in and
among spark discharges, Hertz chose but two for
analysis (1887). Convention has agreeably
restricted its considerations to the same,
affirming that only two fields of influence make
themselves manifest at close distances from a
spark. The induction field, and the "radiowave
field". Induction field effects rapidly fall away
with the inverse square of distance from a spark
center. The "true radio energy" is that wave energy
which loses intensity with the inverse distance
from a spark center. This difference of intensity
with distance from the spark center defines the
radiofield. Radio texts described the "nearzone"
(induction field) and the "farzone" (radiofield).
Patent examiners used this model to eliminate all
but the Marconi claims for wireless transmission of
signals, a tragic reduction. Far more important
demonstrations proved the superiority of geomantic
radio principles. Certain highly qualified
experimenters disagreed with the simplistic
Hertzian view, and contradicted the views of a
growing mainstream (Stubblefield, Tesla, Massey,
Moray).
•••Some
thought that the induction field was the source of
the unusual ground signals, the electrostatic
influence which induced electron oscillations in
the rock immediately beneath transmitter towers.
Much improved ground configurations were thought to
provide additional power to these relatively weak
induction oscillations. Large area copper screens
or grids were pre-buried long before transmitting
towers or aerials were erected. These conductive
screens extended outward from the central
transmitting axis for several hundred yards in some
instances. Thus directly applied, ground currents
were given enormous impulse, a possible reason for
the strong and predominating reception of local
stations in neighborhood receivers. Theoretically,
these induction sources were incapable of
propagating beyond one quarter of a wavelength from
their tower centers. Deep VLF ground currents of 10
kilocycles were therefore not to be received beyond
15 kilometers from their source. The transmission
of 3 megacycle signals would, according to these
expectations, produce ground currents undetected
beyond 250 feet from their source.
•••These
"nearzone-farzone" models did not explain the true
signal strength received through ground antennas.
Why for example, could VLF signals be received from
distances much further than 10,000 miles from their
aerial gantries? Why were shortwave signals
routinely received from distances surpassing 15,000
miles? Nevertheless, the ground antenna made such
signal reception possible. One may yet demonstrate
these dynamics with rudimentary ground rod
antennas, a technique which will shortly be
described. The "nearzone-farzone" model does not
explain why VLF signals are only received along
specific constrictive paths, a mystery which
deepens when it is realized that such conductive
ground paths are never found along strictly
geodesic sections. Field distribution experiments
show the meandering nature of VLF signals across
regions of ground, a fact which correlates their
much-amplified propagation with geomantic current
paths.
•••These
"nearzone-farzone" models did not explain the true
signal strength received through ground antennas.
Why for example, could VLF signals be received from
distances much further than 10,000 miles from their
aerial gantries? Why were shortwave signals
routinely received from distances surpassing 15,000
miles? Nevertheless, the ground antenna made such
signal reception possible. One may yet demonstrate
these dynamics with rudimentary ground rod
antennas, a technique which will shortly be
described. The "nearzone-farzone" model does not
explain why VLF signals are only received along
specific constrictive paths, a mystery which
deepens when it is realized that such conductive
ground paths are never found along strictly
geodesic sections. Field distribution experiments
show the meandering nature of VLF signals across
regions of ground, a fact which correlates their
much-amplified propagation with geomantic current
paths.
•••There
were, in addition, several remarkable reversals of
these same theoretical expectations. Why, across
certain locales, was it impossible to receive the
powerful shortwave transmissions of a station some
several hundred yards away in plain sight? "Radio
blindspots" could not be explained on the basis of
earth conductivity or geophysical characteristics
alone.
•••Buried
terminals gave the clearest proof that aerial
signals and ground signals were of completely
different origin, those of the ground having the
most obvious source in a powerful autodynamic
matrix. Aerial waves were so obviously dissolved
and "digested" in transit from their distant
sources, while ground currents often demonstrated
anomalous intensification in transit. Signals
received through the ground were clarified and
strong.
EARLY IDEAS AND APPROACHES Radio broadcasts -- simultaneous transmission
to multiple locations -- are such an obvious
development that it really doesn't make sense to
try to identify any one person or station as the
originator of the idea. Wire-based systems,
including telegraph "tickers" used for transmitting
stock market reports, and telephone news and
entertainment services, showed the possibilities
for instantaneously distributing information and
audio programming. The next question was whether
the same thing could be done on a wider scale,
without the connecting wires.
••• A
review of Nathan Stubblefield's induction
wireless-telephone, Telephoning Without Wires from
Trumbull White's 1902 Our Wonderful Progress,
quoted the inventor as saying that, although "I
have as yet devised no method whereby it can be
used with privacy", despite this limitation someday
his system might be used "by anyone having a
receiving instument... for the general transmission
of news of every description". An article in the
March 9, 1902, The Atlanta Constitution, Kentucky
Inventor Solves Problem of Wireless Telephony,
reprinted from The Sunny South magazine, reported
on a New Year's transmission of music and spoken
words to seven receivers located throughout Murray,
Kentucky.
Marconi transmitted radio signals for a short
distance in 1896 and successfully complete a
Trans-Atlantic test after the turn of the century.
Marconi's rather simple spark-gap transmitters were
used exclusively until about 1914.
•••
There is a great debate as to when the first
voice broadcast was made. Some say that it first
took place in 1892 at Murray, Kentucky at a
demonstration by Stubblefield, while others argue
that it was 1907 at Brant Rock, Massachusetts when
some nearby ships pickup a program. Lee DeForest,
Who greatly improved the newly invented vacuum
tube, broadcast music by Enrico Caruso in 1910.
There were other tests including the Trans-Atlantic
voice tests made by the US Navy at Arlington,
Virginia in 1915, but regular broadcasting did not
begin until after World War I. The identity of the
first broadcasting station is also debatable.
•
PROGRESSIVE
ERA
http://209.85.173.132/search?q=cache:XNTt6FctuFcJ:www.vermande.us/ai/2074c_Progressive.pdf+navy+communications+in+1910s%2Bstubblefield&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=31&gl=us
(Nathan Stubblefield; on Wireless Telephone)
Everyone will have his own pocket telephone and
may
be called wherever he happens to be. The citizen of
the wireless age will walk abroad with a receiving
apparatus compactly arranged in his hat and tuned
to that one of myriad vibrations by which he has
chosen to be called. . . . When that invention is
perfected, we shall have a new series of daily
miracles. 1908, Nathan Stubblefield of Murray KY
was issued Patent 887357 for a wireless telephone,
intended for communication between stations and
moving vehicles. Futurists quickly saw the
possibilities. Amen
•
Early
Radio History
The Atlanta Constitution, March 9, 1902"Kentucky Inventor Solves Problem of Wireless
Telephone" - Nathan Stubblefield
(Written for The Sunny South.)
THROUGH wood, brick, mortar and solid
stone; through blocks of business houses, over long
distance, through city streets, uninterrupted by
the noise of traffic, Nathan Stubblefield, an
inventor of Murray, Ky., has transmitted the sound
of human voice without wires.
One problem with a new technology is deciding
what to call it. Although "electromagnetic
radiation" is the formal scientific term for what
Heinrich Hertz produced with his spark transmitter,
numerous other descriptive phrases were also used,
including various permutations of "Hertzian waves",
"electric waves", "ether waves", "spark
telegraphy", "space telegraphy", and "wireless".I
concealed the utter disgust I felt for this man and
his stupidity, and hurried home to write about the
"difference" between radio and wireless.
•RADIO
BROADCASTING HISTORY Radio History
TimeLine
http://spartaotr.com/Research-Logs/RadioTimeLine/TimeLine/RadioHistoryTimeLine.html1/1/1902
Nathan Stubblefield makes 1st public
demonstration of radio, Penn.
•The
Great Geek Manual Archive for January, 2009
http://thegreatgeekmanual.com/blog/2009/01/page/6
The first radio broadcast demonstration in the
US is given by Nathan B. Stubblefield at Fairmont
Park in Philadelphia.
The WALLS can be made to emit light, e.g., and
so can the earth outside the earth itself. One of
the pioneers, Stubblefield (before Tesla; we have a
photo of folks watching a Stubblefield demo, where
Tesla is in the onlookers) powered and lit his
cabin this way.
Nathan B. Stubblefield (1860-1926; see also
site), who for the first time in history in 1892
created a radio-connection based upon the energy he
with a coil drew from the earth
John Bedini Audio Interview April 6th 2008 -
Transcript from SkyMeadowMedia
Nathan Stubblefield speaks - tribute to Nathan
Stubblefield - Murray State University
Electrical Battery by NATHAN B.STUBBLEFIELD OF
MURRAY KENTUCKY
The following is a reproduction of Nathan B.
Subblefield Patent the drawing may be inaccurate
due to some difficulty in reading of the patent
drawings Geoff.
In 1892, a Kentucky farmer and inventor, Nathan
Stubblefield, publicly demonstrated wireless. Not
only did he broadcast signals, but he also was able
to broadcast voice and music. He demonstrated
wireless again in 1898 to a documented (by The St.
Louis Dispatch) distance of 500 yards. He
demonstrated a ship-to-shore broadcast on the
Potomac River in Washington, D.C., on March 20,
1902, and received patent number 887,357 for
wireless telephone on May 12, 1908.
A thought on the The Blacklight Power
Corporation
Inventors were bought off, threatened, or
financially ruined by the powers that be. In all
cases their findings were ignored to such a degree
that their inventions were never shown to the
general public. And if their theories made it to
the public, the physics behind it was diluted.
Examples are the original work of James Clerk
Maxwell, or the work of Nicola Tesla, Nathan
Stubblefield
Part
03h
Antenna
Search Results
Icehouse •
Stubblefield
Pages on Nathan Stubblefield and earth
batteries. ... Next Page. E-Mail john1@
icehouse.net Cached
- Similar
pages
•
Making
the Hillsides Blossom With Light
Telephoning without Wires. I have solved the problem of telephoning
without wires through the earth as Signor Marconi
has of sending signals through space. But, I can
also telephone without wires through space as well
as through the earth, because my medium is
everywhere. • I have
solved the problem of telephoning without wires
through the earth as Signor Marconi has of sending
signals through space."
"The past is nothing. I have perfected now the
greatest invention the world has ever known. I have
taken light from the air and the earth, as I did
sound."
Part
04h/
Headline•
Legal
Opinions
•
Directory:
Nathan Stubblefield - From PESWiki
"Nathan Stubblefield's Electrical Battery"
•
Stubblefield's
Wireless - Nathan Stubblefield
The Legend - Variations - The Rest of the Story -
Bibliography
By Garth Haslam
http://www.anomalyinfo.com
The newspaper article won Stubblefield an
invitation to demonstrate his invention in
Washington, DC. At this demonstration one of his
boxes was placed on a steamship, the Bartholdi, on
the Potomac River, while a number of other boxes
were positioned along the shore at sites of the
users' choosing. Communication between the boxes --
including the one on the ship -- was fantastically
clear. Stubblefield also demonstrated his wireless
telephone in Philadelphia and New York that same
year.
•
WapediaWiki:
Nathan Stubblefield
In 1903, he could transmit 375 feet without earth
connections, using induction. In 1904, he could
transmit 423 yards. The total wire required for the
transmitting and receiving coils was of a greater
length than what would be required to simply
interconnect the transmitter and receiver, but the
invention would allow mobility. • By 1907,
with a 60 foot transmitting coil, he could work 1/4
mile or 1320 feet "nicely." On May 12, 1908, he
received U.S. patent 887,357 for his Wireless
Telephone, using the voice frequency induction
system. He said in the patent that it would be
useful for "securing telephonic communications
between moving vehicles and way stations". • The
diagram shows wireless telephony from trains,
boats, and wagons. In foreign patents he showed
wireless telephony with cars. U he was using
voice-modulated continuous high frequency waves, as
used for radio today. [1] •Reginald
Fessenden had already made a widely heard radio
voice broadcast, using a rotary spark gap
transmitter, on December 24, 1906.
100.
www.wmnf.org/files/2008_WMNF_EEO.pdf -
Similar
pages •
101.Nathan
B. Stubblefield Foundation WMNF Community
Radio 88.5 FM
... • 102. Louis
D. Putney of Tampa was elected board vice president
of the Nathan B. Stubblefield
Foundation WMNF Community Radio 88.5
FM. •103.goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/gi_0199-3565981/Nathan-B-Stubblefield-
Foundation-WMNF.html - 20k - Cached-
Similar
pages • 104.
Earth
Energy and Vocal Radio - Nathan Stubblefield
-
StumbleUpon •
Nathan
Beverley Stubblefield,1860 -
1928 • His
initial experiments involved the development and
examination of simple earth batteries: buried
metallic arrangements, which produced weak
electrolytic power, during the early stages of this
charge building process, the characteristic weak
output was observed. This was usually a volt at
half an amp, the general electrolytic output of
buried metals. • However,
if properly placed, the energetic output of his
cell would be phenomenal. Finding such a power
point, he buried one of his cells. The process took
a week or more to build strength. Once the cell was
"saturated" it became (in his words) "a conduit of
earth charge. •
"Stubblefield simply stated that the
fully saturated coil suddenly "manifested an
electromotive force far greater than any known
wet-cell." This state being achieved, the current
flowed in "commercial electrical volumes."
Stubblefield developed a peculiar bi-metallic
induction coil which, when buried, draw up
sufficient electrical power to operate lamps and
other appliances which he designed and tested.
•
ExtraOrdinary
Technology Conference 2007 Resonant Energy
"From the Arc to Stubblefield," by John Arthur
Taylor
One of the main pioneers of this unique energy
source was Nathan Stubblefield. Stubblefield
claimed he could send messages through the air
without wires. On January 1, 1902 Stubblefield and
his son Bernard had set up two boxes 200 ft apart
that were not connected in any visible way.
Not one of these later systems ever achieved the
same results of clarity, tone, and volume of
Stubblefield ground telephony.
•
Internet
Archives Library - A Chronological
History of Electrical Development from 600 B.C.
1892 NATHAN B. STUBBLEFIELD ( ) demonstrates a
radio broadcast. In 1902 he gave a public
exhibition of his invention in Fairmont Park,
Philadelphia, his voice being heard a mile from the
transmitter. He was granted Patent No. 887,357, May
12, 1908.
1892 The General Electric Company is
organized and incorporated April 15 by a
consolidation of the Edison General Electric
Co.
•
Making
the Hillside Blossom with Light Two weeks before his death, Stubblefield
visited with a neighbor, Mrs. L. E. Owen. He asked
her to write his story. He said, "I've lived fifty
years before my time." The past is nothing.
•
"The
Real Father of Radio" By Lorenzo Milam from material in article by
Thos. Hoffer in THE JOURNAL OF BROADCASTING. Summer
1971. Also found in The Original Sex and
Broadcasting, by Lorenzo Milam Lorenzo Milam from
material in article by Thos. Hoffer in
•
Nathan
Stubblefield - ForgottenGenius Of Wireless
PhonesFrom Jack C. Robinson
"Kentucky farmer invents wireless telephone" blared
the St. Louis Post-Dispatch on January 12, 1902.
The full-page feature article described the
remarkable natural-conduction device invented by
Nathan Stubblefield, a 42-year-old melon farmer
who'd devoted every spare hour and penny he had to
establishing telephone service in his hometown,
Murray, Ky. This time--his third attempt at
connecting the widely separated households in the
area--Stubblefield was sure he had Ma Bell by the
horns.
•
"Earth
Energy and Vocal Radio" Nathan
Stubblefield VISIONARY "Lost Science" by Gerry Vassilatos They were powered by an extraordinary receiver
of ground electricity, which produced great
quantities of a strange
"electricity."
•
105.Website review of
Earth Energy and Vocal Radio - Nathan
Stubblefield in Science/
Tech. Part
05h -
Editor's
Notes •
Reviews
/ Editorial Chart
• Editorial Calendar / Events Calendar /
NBS100
TeleComunication Study - Regulatory Frequency
Seizure
SMART DAAF BOYS - The
history of radio and tevision and the life and
style of Nathan B. Stubblefield. A Four-Volume-Set
written by Troy Cory-Stubblefield and Josie Cory,
Desktop Dictionary: Research: Co-Author: Mark Sova.
Includes the Cory/Woods/Harris Washington D.C.
demonstrations in 1992 at the Smithsonian. Elliot
Sivowitch in attendance.
Edwards, Frank 1959 -
"Neglected Genius," Stranger Than Science,
Lyle Stuart, Inc., pgs. 9-11 [NOTE: I've found
that most of the stories that Edwards presents in
Stranger Than Science are originally from accounts
in FATE Magazine, for which he wrote several
articles and was apparently a regular reader. So,
it seems likely there is an account of
Stubblefield's wireless somewhere within the pages
of FATE, which I will check on.]
Hoffer, Thomas W. 1971 -
"Nathan B. Stubblefield and His Wireless
Telephone," Journal of Broadcasting, Vol. XV, No.3,
Summer 1971, pg. 317-329.
Horten, L.J. - 1937 -
"Another 'Inventor of Radio," Broadcasting and
Broadcast Advertising, January 1, 1937, pg. 32
[NOTE: The entire text of a radio broadcast
made by Horton is quoted within the text of this
article, and this is what is referenced here.]
Kane, Joseph Nathan.
1933 - "Radio Broadcast,"
Famous First Facts, 1933, pg. 423 Lambert, Edward
C.
1970 - "Let's hear it for
Bernard Stubblefield!", TV Guide, October 10, 1970,
pg. 18-20 Monument (author unknown).
1930 - Text from the
Stubblefield monument on the campus of the Murray
State College in Murray, Kentucky. It reads thus:
HERE IN 1902 NATHAN B. STUBBLEFIELD 1860 - 1928
INVENTOR OF RADIO -- BROADCAST AND RECEIVED THE
HUMAN VOICE BY WIRELESS. HE MADE EXPERIMENTS 10
YEARS EARLIER. HIS HOME WAS 100 FEET
WEST.
Sivowitch, Elliot N. 1970
- "A Technological Survey of Broadcasting's
'Pre-History,' 1876-1920," Journal of Broadcasting,
Vol. XV, No.1, Winter 970-1971, pg. 1-20.
World Book:
1961a - "Induction, Electric," World Book
Encyclopedia, Vol. 9, 1961, pg. 178
1961b - "Radio, History," World Book Encyclopedia,
Vol. 15, 1961, pg. 87.
Selected Episodes, of the
Stubblefield Story, with limited TelePlay rights,
can be purchased for $39.95 on Amazon.com in the
VHS, DVD category. At will - Shop at:Amazon.com,
Search
VHS,
then type
inTelePlay Preview,
then
click
GO. Or
Click Here To Go Direct To Amazon.com - TelePlay
Preview
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
20
Part
06h headline/
Acknowledgments ®™©
NBS Authentication - Use
of ISBN - CLICK
FOR MORE FREE USE OF THE NBS
ISBN.
