•
Part
01h
Feature
Story
- Ask Priscilla! • Why -
They Said It:
TVInews attempts
to uncover the true intent of an "extra ordinary
story" by an author, and the publishers' reasoning
as to why they printed the story line. TheySaidIt
is a major journalistic course in the study of Dr.
Lawrence Farwell 's "Brain Fingerprinting"
technology. You'll find that one man's
disappointment, is another man's achievement.MORE
Yes90 They Said
It-113
BY WALDON FAWCETT;
sea passenger
The latest and one of the most
interesting systems of wireless communication with
which experiments have recently been conducted is
the invention of Nathan Stubblefield, of Murray,
Ky., an electrical engineer who is the patentee of
a number of devices both in this country and
abroad. The Stubblefield system differs from that
originated by Marconi in that utilization is made
of the electrical currents of the earth instead of
the ethereal waves employed by the Italian
inventor, and which, by the way, it is now claimed,
are less powerful and more susceptible to
derangement by electrical disturbances than the
currents found in the earth and water. In this new
system, however, as in that formulated by Marconi,
a series of vibrations is created, and what is
known as the Hertzian electrical wave currents are
used.
•
Early
Radio History
The Atlanta Constitution, March 9, 1902"Kentucky Inventor Solves Problem of Wireless
Telephone" - Nathan Stubblefield
(Written for The Sunny South.)
THROUGH wood, brick, mortar and solid
stone; through blocks of business houses, over long
distance, through city streets, uninterrupted by
the noise of traffic, Nathan Stubblefield, an
inventor of Murray, Ky., has transmitted the sound
of human voice without wires.
One problem with a new technology is deciding
what to call it. Although "electromagnetic
radiation" is the formal scientific term for what
Heinrich Hertz produced with his spark transmitter,
numerous other descriptive phrases were also used,
including various permutations of "Hertzian waves",
"electric waves", "ether waves", "spark
telegraphy", "space telegraphy", and "wireless".I
concealed the utter disgust I felt for this man and
his stupidity, and hurried home to write about the
"difference" between radio and wireless.
•RADIO
BROADCASTING HISTORY Radio History
TimeLine
http://spartaotr.com/Research-Logs/RadioTimeLine/TimeLine/RadioHistoryTimeLine.html1/1/1902
Nathan Stubblefield makes 1st public
demonstration of radio, Penn.
•The
Great Geek Manual Archive for January, 2009
http://thegreatgeekmanual.com/blog/2009/01/page/6
The first radio broadcast demonstration in the
US is given by Nathan B. Stubblefield at Fairmont
Park in Philadelphia.
The WALLS can be made to emit light, e.g., and
so can the earth outside the earth itself. One of
the pioneers, Stubblefield (before Tesla; we have a
photo of folks watching a Stubblefield demo, where
Tesla is in the onlookers) powered and lit his
cabin this way.
Nathan B. Stubblefield (1860-1926; see also
site), who for the first time in history in 1892
created a radio-connection based upon the energy he
with a coil drew from the earth
John Bedini Audio Interview April 6th 2008 -
Transcript from SkyMeadowMedia
Nathan Stubblefield speaks - tribute to Nathan
Stubblefield - Murray State University
Electrical Battery by NATHAN B.STUBBLEFIELD OF
MURRAY KENTUCKY
The following is a reproduction of Nathan B.
Subblefield Patent the drawing may be inaccurate
due to some difficulty in reading of the patent
drawings Geoff.
In 1892, a Kentucky farmer and inventor, Nathan
Stubblefield, publicly demonstrated wireless. Not
only did he broadcast signals, but he also was able
to broadcast voice and music. He demonstrated
wireless again in 1898 to a documented (by The St.
Louis Dispatch) distance of 500 yards. He
demonstrated a ship-to-shore broadcast on the
Potomac River in Washington, D.C., on March 20,
1902, and received patent number 887,357 for
wireless telephone on May 12, 1908.
A thought on the The Blacklight Power
Corporation
Inventors were bought off, threatened, or
financially ruined by the powers that be. In all
cases their findings were ignored to such a degree
that their inventions were never shown to the
general public. And if their theories made it to
the public, the physics behind it was diluted.
Examples are the original work of James Clerk
Maxwell, or the work of Nicola Tesla, Nathan
Stubblefield
Part
03h
Antenna
Search Results
Icehouse •
Stubblefield
Pages on Nathan Stubblefield and earth
batteries. ... Next Page. E-Mail john1@
icehouse.net Cached
- Similar
pages
•
Making
the Hillsides Blossom With Light
Telephoning without Wires. I have solved the problem of telephoning
without wires through the earth as Signor Marconi
has of sending signals through space. But, I can
also telephone without wires through space as well
as through the earth, because my medium is
everywhere. • I have
solved the problem of telephoning without wires
through the earth as Signor Marconi has of sending
signals through space."
"The past is nothing. I have perfected now the
greatest invention the world has ever known. I have
taken light from the air and the earth, as I did
sound."
•
Stubblefield's
Wireless - Nathan Stubblefield
The Legend - Variations - The Rest of the Story -
Bibliography
By Garth Haslam
http://www.anomalyinfo.com
The newspaper article won Stubblefield an
invitation to demonstrate his invention in
Washington, DC. At this demonstration one of his
boxes was placed on a steamship, the Bartholdi, on
the Potomac River, while a number of other boxes
were positioned along the shore at sites of the
users' choosing. Communication between the boxes --
including the one on the ship -- was fantastically
clear. Stubblefield also demonstrated his wireless
telephone in Philadelphia and New York that same
year.
•
WapediaWiki:
Nathan Stubblefield
In 1903, he could transmit 375 feet without earth
connections, using induction. In 1904, he could
transmit 423 yards. The total wire required for the
transmitting and receiving coils was of a greater
length than what would be required to simply
interconnect the transmitter and receiver, but the
invention would allow mobility. • By 1907,
with a 60 foot transmitting coil, he could work 1/4
mile or 1320 feet "nicely." On May 12, 1908, he
received U.S. patent 887,357 for his Wireless
Telephone, using the voice frequency induction
system. He said in the patent that it would be
useful for "securing telephonic communications
between moving vehicles and way stations". • The
diagram shows wireless telephony from trains,
boats, and wagons. In foreign patents he showed
wireless telephony with cars. U he was using
voice-modulated continuous high frequency waves, as
used for radio today. [1] •Reginald
Fessenden had already made a widely heard radio
voice broadcast, using a rotary spark gap
transmitter, on December 24, 1906.
• Q.
If you attach 'in a
computer' to your application for a process or
Element from patent, is that enough to pass the
machine-or-transformation test?
• A.
"The patent office has
been saying no, that you need to show a special
machine has been built for this purpose," Lemley
said, SEE MORE FOR
THE Barbie says YES! -- if you're working on the
Copyright, Trademark first
angle.
•••
"The Supreme
Court hasn't ruled on what is patentable since
1981, Lemley said, leaving the federal appeals
courts to apply standards set in the infancy of the
information age to complex modern innovations.
•••"The
computer world has changed a lot since 1981. The
courts have the power to adapt the law and keep it
up with changing technologies, and they had been
doing that. But Bilski is a step backward," Lemley
said.
•••Not
all high-tech leaders want Bilski overturned.
Although it's true that health science industries
often rely on patents to recover research and
development investments, information technology
advances move too fast to benefit much from patent
protections.
•••"Patents
like the one at issue in Bilski give a bad name to
the patent system," said Horacio Gutierrez, a
Microsoft vice president for intellectual property
and licensing and deputy general counsel.
•••Inventor
Bilski, arguing for the Supreme Court review, says
business methods like his formula are crucial to
spurring economic growth. He says the appeals court
decision is "a throwback to the 19th century, when
our economy was primarily manufacturing-based, and
fails to recognize that many inventions are based
on ideas not necessarily tied to a machine or piece
of equipment."
But a recent case before the
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
points up the difficulty of making such judgments
in the age of the Internet.
•••
Bernard Bilski and Rand
Warsaw of WeatherWise USA Inc. in Pittsburgh
developed a computerized method for using weather
data to predict commodities prices and energy
costs. But their efforts to patent the formula were
rejected by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, a
decision upheld by the federal appeals court.
•••The
inventors and their intellectual property lawyers
argue that novel business concepts deserve patent
protection as much as physical machines that
transform industries.
•••They
have petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to review
the appeals court ruling. They say that without the
ability to profit from such inventions, the biotech
and information services companies that have put
such places as Silicon Valley and Redmond, Wash.,
on the world innovation map won't be willing to
invest in research and development of other
breakthroughs.
•••The
patent office's and court's rejections of Bilski
and Warsaw's business method patent claim follows
years of rather liberal interpretations by patent
examiners as to what qualified as an invention. And
the new standard imposed, that the invention must
involve a machine or a physical transformation,
threatens to put the brakes on the busiest area of
patent application and analysis. Of the 13,779
"process" patents sought last year, just 1,643 were
granted.
•••Californians
hold 24% of the 20-year patents issued in the
United States, more than residents of any other
state.
•••The
Oct. 30 ruling in the case, referred to in legal
shorthand simply as Bilski, already has been cited
by the patent office as grounds for rejecting
applications on seismic data analysis and a method
of converting an Internet domain name to read both
left to right, for languages like English, and in
the opposite direction, for languages like Arabic
and Hebrew.
SMART DAAF BOYS - The
history of radio and tevision and the life and
style of Nathan B. Stubblefield. A Four-Volume-Set
written by Troy Cory-Stubblefield and Josie Cory,
Desktop Dictionary: Research: Co-Author: Mark Sova.
Includes the Cory/Woods/Harris Washington D.C.
demonstrations in 1992 at the Smithsonian. Elliot
Sivowitch in attendance.
Edwards, Frank 1959 -
"Neglected Genius," Stranger Than Science,
Lyle Stuart, Inc., pgs. 9-11 [NOTE: I've found
that most of the stories that Edwards presents in
Stranger Than Science are originally from accounts
in FATE Magazine, for which he wrote several
articles and was apparently a regular reader. So,
it seems likely there is an account of
Stubblefield's wireless somewhere within the pages
of FATE, which I will check on.]
Hoffer, Thomas W. 1971 -
"Nathan B. Stubblefield and His Wireless
Telephone," Journal of Broadcasting, Vol. XV, No.3,
Summer 1971, pg. 317-329.
Horten, L.J. - 1937 -
"Another 'Inventor of Radio," Broadcasting and
Broadcast Advertising, January 1, 1937, pg. 32
[NOTE: The entire text of a radio broadcast
made by Horton is quoted within the text of this
article, and this is what is referenced here.]
Kane, Joseph Nathan.
1933 - "Radio Broadcast,"
Famous First Facts, 1933, pg. 423 Lambert, Edward
C.
1970 - "Let's hear it for
Bernard Stubblefield!", TV Guide, October 10, 1970,
pg. 18-20 Monument (author unknown).
1930 - Text from the
Stubblefield monument on the campus of the Murray
State College in Murray, Kentucky. It reads thus:
HERE IN 1902 NATHAN B. STUBBLEFIELD 1860 - 1928
INVENTOR OF RADIO -- BROADCAST AND RECEIVED THE
HUMAN VOICE BY WIRELESS. HE MADE EXPERIMENTS 10
YEARS EARLIER. HIS HOME WAS 100 FEET
WEST.
Sivowitch, Elliot N. 1970
- "A Technological Survey of Broadcasting's
'Pre-History,' 1876-1920," Journal of Broadcasting,
Vol. XV, No.1, Winter 970-1971, pg. 1-20.
World Book:
1961a - "Induction, Electric," World Book
Encyclopedia, Vol. 9, 1961, pg. 178
1961b - "Radio, History," World Book Encyclopedia,
Vol. 15, 1961, pg. 87.
Selected Episodes, of the
Stubblefield Story, with limited TelePlay rights,
can be purchased for $39.95 on Amazon.com in the
VHS, DVD category. At will - Shop at:Amazon.com,
Search
VHS,
then type
inTelePlay Preview,
then
click
GO. Or
Click Here To Go Direct To Amazon.com - TelePlay
Preview
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
20
Part
06h headline/
Acknowledgments ®™©
NBS Authentication - Use
of ISBN - CLICK
FOR MORE FREE USE OF THE NBS
ISBN.
