(You
MAY need the FREE QuickTime
plug-in to view and hear s90tv) top top top top 102 / Internet TODAY'S
PUZZLE? This
Week's
Cover
Dear Editor LookRadio 120
PIXELS 3 columns Part
02 /
On March, 17 2006, a federal
judge has dismissed a lawsuit alleging that Google
Inc.'s Web search systems infringe a publisher's
copyright. 3.
Editor's Note
/ The
U.S. CONSTITUTION - Amendment
V - states amonst other
things that: No person shall . . . be deprived of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of
law; nor shall private property be taken for public
use, without just compensation. More
Articles Converging
News 122006 / TeleCom BuyOuts, Spinoffs and Asset
Seizure Boom Respectfully
Submitted top top top 40 40+110+570=720
-
102 smart90.com/tvimagazine/2006/12006106GoogleNBSClaims.htm/
Movies
CLICK
S90
Google
IMAGES
1.
Feature Story / More
About Loopholes, Missteps and Payment time for
Patent, Copyrights and Trademark owners. Does a
® © symbol mean anything, if promote
sexual seduction guides?
Hong
Kong
Triad
/
"Jockey Club"
RadioPlayMusic
"When Google Inc. began its
explosive rise nearly six years ago," wrote Matthew
Fordahl for AP on April 30, 2004, "it was
unconventional in its stark layout, absence of
annoying banner ads and unprecedented
usefulness."
Before the filing for its
much-hyped initial public offering in 2004,
co-founder Larry Page promised to make the world
``a better place,'' and says the company won't ``be
evil.''
The often-folksy Page note
described in his ``owners manual'' that Google
would put "long-term opportunities ahead of
short-term benefits, pamper employees and even
start a charitable
foundation."
``When you start saying
things like this, I think you set yourself up for a
fall,'' said Tom Taulli, an author and lecturer at
the University of Southern California's Marshall
School of
Business.
``I can see a front-page
story a couple years from now. ... You've got to be
careful what you say. It might come back to haunt
you in the end,'' he
said.
"But that's not what's
happening today," says, attorney Charles Portz, of
NBS Reglatory Studies, . . . "it's still all about
Google trying to be the same unconventional
web-service it was in 2004, still GIVING AWAY FREE
KNOWLEDGE, and a great index and glossory to the
world." The absence of annoying banner ads and the
unprecedented usefulness to give the user of
Google, a FREE Liberal Arts Education . . . is
still happening, except for the complainer like,
Gordon Roy Parker of Philadelphia.
Surrick found that Google
was protected against the claims of Gordon Roy
Parker of Philadelphia. by an exemption to the
Communications Decency Act for online service
providers acting as an automatic re-distributor of
published
material.
In a ruling issued March 10
and made known Thursday, Judge R. Barclay Surrick
of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District
of Pennsylvania rejected the 11 claims against
Google that included copyright and trademark
infringement, invasion of privacy, negligence,
racketeering, abuse of legal process and civil
conspiracy.
Parker, an online publisher
of sexual seduction guides with such titles as "Why
Hotties Choose Losers," is a former paralegal who
was acting in Pro Per, in suing Google. His site
also offers racetrack betting and chess-playing
tips.
Surrick found that Google
was protected by an exemption to the Communications
Decency Act for online service providers acting as
an automatic re-distributor of published
material.
Parker's original 72-page
complaint had argued that Google was responsible
for anonymous Web postings attacking him in Usenet
newsgroups that Google archives and via the
newsgroup and general Web search systems it
offers.
Since the
early years of 1900s,
when the patent and
trademark laws were changed to better serve the
owner and consumer of ® © symbols,
the lingering question comes once again from Google
Supporters.
Observers
question how Google's corporate philosophy would
withstand hard times when the ® ©
symbol question was bound to pop up. Even though
Schmidt, was once an executive at Sun Microsystems
Inc. and Novell Inc., and was familiar with being
squashed by Microsoft, the other parts of Google's
corporate triumvirate "have been experiencing legal
adversity," says, attorney Charles Portz, of NBS
Reglatory Studies.
"I don't know
if there's the killer instinct at Google,'' he
said. ``There's this egalitarian, humanitarian
(philosophy). . . . They're going up against some
very ruthless competitors and evil thinkers."
"But Google,"
says Portz," has the U.S. Constitution to rely on,
especially when a web page submission is published
on the Internet, asking for no compensation. If you
want to get paid from Google or any other search
engine, your web page should include, 'I reserve
the right to the story and story idea for
compensation.' " Google, Yahoo and Smart90.com
offers a pay per click program. The side bar ads
are called, AdSense and KudoAds.
NO ONE OWNS THE FACTS OF HISTORY
In the U.S., many
Copyrighted works are automatically protected for
70 years past the author's death. "The law does not
apply to facts, ideas or theories, "just
expressions of them," says Portz. Although the line
between ideas and expressions can be blurry, says
Portz, "it should be clear enough to let novelists
and filmmakers build their fiction on a foundation
of history -- real or theoretical, that's the
reason I suggest that if you want to get paid for
your web page submissions published on the Internet
containing ® and © symbols -- IF YOU
DO NOT ASK FOR COMPENSATION and a method for
immediate payment, -- don't expect anything. That's
the way the Internet works.
Copyright law is already too
far-reaching, particularly in the U.S., where many
works are automatically protected for 70 years past
the author's death. Perhaps the most important
limit on that protection is that it does not apply
to facts, ideas or theories, just expressions of
them. Although the line between ideas and
expressions can be blurry, it should be clear
enough to let novelists and filmmakers build their
fiction on a foundation of history -- real or
theoretical.
Josie
Cory
Publisher/Editor
TVI Magazine
TVI
Magazine, tviNews.net, YES90, Your Easy Search,
Associated Press, Reuters, BBC, LA Times, NY Times,
VRA's D-Diaries, Industry Press Releases, They Said
It and SmartSearch were used in compiling and
ascertaining this Yes90 news
report.
©1956-2007.
Copyright. All rights reserved by: TVI
Publications, VRA TelePlay Pictures, xingtv and Big
Six Media Entertainments. Tel/Fax: 323
462.1099.
GOOGLE
KudoADS
We Preserve The Moment
Yes90 tviNews S90
TVInews
- Google Wins Copyright Law Suit. A federal
judge has dismissed a lawsuit alleging infringement
on a Sex publisher's copyright. Charles
Portz, of NBS Reglatory Studies
on property seizure.
Violation of U.S. Constitution nbs100 - MORE
STORY
NEWS
Convergence - 12th Week of 2006 Winter
Issue /
/ Feature
Story / 106GoogleNBSClaims.htm
/
Smart90, lookradio, nbs100, tvimagazine, vratv,
xingtv, Ddiaries, Soulfind, nbstubblefield,
congming90, chinaexpo, vralogo, Look Radio, China
Expo, Soul Find, s90tv, wifi90, dv90, nbs 100,
Josie Cory, Publisher, Troy Cory, ePublisher, Troy
Cory-Stubblefield /
Kudoads,
Photo Image665, Movies
- Television With No Borders
How
Do We Do Business?
Tel
323 462-1099
SEND
E-MAIL
Return
To
Top